Showing posts with label John Hurt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Hurt. Show all posts

Monday, 16 January 2012

Film Review: Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

With the Cold War in full swing, a botched covert operation to find a double-agent placed within the highest echelons of British intelligence costs head-honcho 'Control' (Hurt) and right-hand man Smiley (Oldman) their jobs. When new information from a rogue operative (Hardy) reignites rumours of a traitor, Smiley is pulled from retirement to spy on the spies and smoke out the mole.

Upon setting up his task force, Smiley learns 'Control' had long harboured fears of a spy within the ranks, distrusting even those in the inner circle. 'Control's' suspicions are visualised through pictures of his suspects taped to chess pieces and given code names from a nursery rhyme. 'Tinker' is the career driven Percy Alleline (Jones); 'Tailor' the mordant Bill Haydon (Firth); 'Soldier' a breviloquent Roy Bland (Hinds); 'Poor Man' persnickety Hungarian immigrant Toby Esterhase (Dencik); and finally amongst 'Control's' suspects miserable sack of spuds George Smiley himself, designated 'Beggarman'.  Aptly nicknamed 'The Circus', they are the high-value pieces at the top of MI6, each operating in accordance of their assigned chess pieces in a grand game of strategy. Others such as Smiley's aide, Peter Guilliam (Cumberbatch), are soon roped into this game of cat and mouse as things become infinitely more complex and dangerous. No chess game would be complete of course without its sacrificial pawns. Mark Strong's Jim Prideaux and Tom Hardy's Ricki Tarr; men who do 'The Circus'' dirty work, complete the essential piece of the puzzle. And suddenly the game is afoot!

And some puzzle it is. Adapted from famous spy novelist John LeCarré's book of the same name, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy ensnares its audience in a tense world of old boys clubs and mountains of dusty files. It is a merciless roller coaster of savage bureaucratic espionage and infighting, where trust is always a misnomer and nothing is ever as it seems. And for a spy film which omits the frantic rush to stop a ticking bomb or some other calamitous mayhem, there is always a very real sense of danger and foreboding. There's so much uncertainty and paranoia floating about that the subsequent climate this creates is palpably volatile. While very understated, it's also very real. You really just don't know what the next twist is, and that's frighteningly dangerous in its own right.

It's this atmosphere, buoyed by its murky seventies Cold War setting, which makes Tinker Tailor a thoroughly absorbing experience. Rather than feeling dated or stuck in bygone era, this is more a homage than an attempt to invigorate a period for the here and now. It's unashamedly grey and brown, set firmly in a place where time doesn't flow, but is frozen. The characters are also part of this forlorn tapestry where then fashionable brown and orange wallpaper reflects the ribald, exhausted looking priests of British intelligence. It's a rich, nuanced world created here by Swedish director Thomas Alfredson (Let The Right One), inviting an investment where you want to know who's doing what to whom and why. While the drab aesthetic is without doubt entrancing, it's of critical importance to heed another MI6 employee who uttered those infamous words "do pay attention double-O-seven". One must constantly concentrate throughout Tinker Tailor, a film so vast in its complexity of twists, turns, counter-twists and counter-turns that even Otto von Bismarck would be left scratching his head. Yes it's dense, difficult and depressing to follow at the best of times, but like in real spy-dom a fastidious attention to detail will yield rewards.

Where the mystery of the mole is engaging in itself, perhaps more enthralling are the nuances of the men involved. One might expect that the collective which constitute 'The Circus' would be the staunchest defenders of democracy and the Western way of life, patriotic chaps who represent the best of British. What's engrossing is how much further from this ideal these men could be. Instead we have alarmingly fallible men disillusioned and cynical of those in power who, as a consequence, are liable to becoming unprincipled traitors to those that may offer a better deal. It is a chord which would have resonated with its Cold War audience of the time, an idea that the West was a spent force and had no more to offer other than the gratification of greed - an amorality eschewed by its ascetic rivals in the East. It was a very real fear that such exotic influences could be allowed to fester at the core of society, an indolence to protect a system that offered little, yet where a failure to do so could let in something far worse. The film's ashen-grey setting of seventies London does much to enhance this feeling of a decadent West about to cave on itself. If you know the history of the period - the rise of trade unions, three-day weeks, power cuts, IMF bailouts - then you can begin to see why no one would want to invest in a nation, a system, which offered nothing. Britain wasn't alone in its problems. American reputation lay in tatters for its war in Vietnam while CIA coups brought people like Pinochet to power. At home it faced the most famous political scandal of the twentieth-century, Watergate. The seventies were very much a period that shook the central tennets of Western civilisation and while you might not think much of Tinker Tailor's archaism it is still quite possible to draw parallels to today. Once again confidence in the system has dramatically plummeted in the face of joblessness, corruption scandals and high bonuses for those who messed up in the first place. Despite being set in a world structured along fundamentally different lines, perhaps ironically this bears more relevance now than any time since.

The film's other underlying current, betrayal, is one which permeates throughout on multiple levels. From betrayal of queen and country to that of personal relationships and self, a vivid picture of the world these ringmasters live in soon emerges. Here sexuality is used to emphasise this, an issue which the book skirts over but one which Alfredson chose to add to great effect. For example, Smiley's wife Ann is shown to be a serial cheater, apportioning favours to close work colleague, Haydon. Ricki Tarr meanwhile forms a connection with a woman on a secret mission abroad, promising her a new life in the West only to fail in saving her from the torturous clutches of the KGB. Hard-as-nails field agent Jim Prideaux, best friends with Haydon since their time at an all boys school, is driven to extreme actions more becoming of a bond which supersedes friendship. But while sex does much to highlight this theme of betrayal what it shows more of is how this group of people, these intelligence deities who preside over the nation's safety and are the frontline against the threat of an international communist conspiracy are just as prone to error as anyone else. Perhaps even more so. They are mortals, as frail and susceptible to emotion as the next person, and this provides a strange yet fascinating twist for an otherwise emotionally cold film.

As one might gather, Tinker Tailor has managed to assemble a sterling ensemble of some of Britain's finest actors. Smiley wasn't the easiest role for Oldman to fill, given that LeCarré's book was made into a BBC miniseries where the character became inextricably linked with an impeccable portrayal by Alec Guinness. Indeed, so synonymous did Guinness become with the book's inscrutable protagonist that Tinker Tailor has drawn some skepticism. Oldman fortunately is superb, eerily motionless but in possession of a piercing mind as he pulls off stoicism in an amoral world of double-crossing and egotistical opportunists. He is a very British type of hero - tired, colourless, and defeated in demeanour, yet despite his nonchalance and drab appearance is a master of his trade - someone you underestimate at your peril. Cumberbatch's recent meteoric rise to fame is once again fully justified here as is another rising star, Tom Hardy, showing a versatility in a role which couldn't be further removed from his latest character, Bane, in the upcoming Dark Knight Rises. As we've come to expect from John Hurt his vitriolic 'Control' is excellent while the time travelling Colin Firth does what he does best, seamlessly blending into yet another period drama. Likewise Mark Strong, not a villain for once, yet again turns in a 'strong' performance.

In the past few years we've had the explosive antics of Bond and Bourne, but this, without any hint of things going boom or martial arts madness, could easily be considered more exciting then either of them. There's no Pussy Galore, Aston Martins fitted with ejector seats or exotic locales here - only piles of disheveled documents situated in drab London settings and dinky little caravans. It's the cerebral spy thriller, a 'whodunnit' that would test even the combined grey matter of Poirot and Marple. Admittedly it can be a little ponderous, and perhaps the biggest let down to this clever caper is its final reveal. While commendable in its lack of histrionics it is perhaps a bit too understated. However, considering this is a film inhabited by deeply flawed monomaniacs and quislings afflicted with paranoia and sociopathy, this won't stop you from being sucked into its smart and dreary world.

Tuesday, 27 September 2011

Film Review: Melancholia

While the idea of interplanetary collision might seem ridiculous there are those who take the hypothesis very seriously, genuinely believing that the ending of the Mayan calendar in 2012 coincides with the return of a tenth planetoid to our solar system. Known as 'Nibiru', the planet is said to be in a 3,600 year elliptical orbit and is supposedly due to wreak havoc on Earth either by crashing into it or passing so close that it will fuck with the weather, tectonic plates and cause polar shifts. You would think that with less than a year and a half to go we'd be able to see it in the sky by now but the reason as to why we cannot, allegedly, is because it's approaching from the direction of the sun. Regardless, I'm guessing this is the inspiration director Lars von Trier took for his latest film, Melancholia.

You could be forgiven for thinking that you just walked in on the beginning of The Tree of Life given Melancholia's similar opening. We start with a lengthy overture to Wagner's 'Tristan & Isolde' over a compilation of mesmerising cosmic images. Cut to slow-motion captures of an impassive Kirsten Dunst in some eerie apocalyptic world where birds drop from the sky around her. Then a horse falls over, before cutting back to space as a beautiful celestial body slams into the Earth. It's somewhat disorientating to essentially stick 'the end' first, but one might imagine it was done for the purpose of setting a tone and framing subsequent proceedings in Von Trier's perspective on life. Jumping back to Earth we find a limo struggling to navigate its way round a tight bend. Newlyweds Michael (Skargård) and Justine (Dunst) are on the way to their very expensive reception organised by Justine's sister, Claire (Gainsbourg), and paid for by her gasbag husband John (Sutherland). Family tensions erupt and the wedding teeters on the brink of catastrophe as family dynamics and the dysfunctionalities therein are revealed. But maybe it was written in the stars because a rogue planet named Melancholia is hurtling toward Earth on a collision course. As the planet nears, otherwise level-headed Claire begins to break-down while clinically depressed Justine torpidly accepts the end of the world.

Melancholia is Von Trier's comeback from the universally panned Antichrist. The tortured director tried to explain that his work painted a picture of his own depression, and it seems to be much the same case here. Whatever you might think of Von Trier, he certainly has a knack for riling people and generating debate. His most admirable quality, whether it offends or not, is to daringly confront taboo subjects people would rather ignore at the risk of public ridicule. His works exists not to appeal to the masses, but to expunge his own troubled mind. And what a dark mind it is. The central thrust of Melancholia is thus; life is futile and meaningless where people's lives and problems are inconsequential, holding them up against grand cosmic images only to highlight how trivial they are. Even the film's setting, a stateless and featureless location in which a big empty house rests is indicative of this, personifying themes of loneliness and emptiness. As if adding insult to injury, Von Trier very matter of factly ends the world in such an understated and gentle way as if no one will realise we were ever there. It's all rather jarring just how Melancholia's themes are treated in such an abrasively calm manner. Not that all this matters anyway.

At its core Melancholia is a tale of two sisters, Justine's unravelling proving particularly enthralling to watch. At first seen as a pretty, level-headed young woman, her behaviour gradually becomes more abnormal to the point where she threatens to disrupt the entire wedding reception. Given the allusions to her loving, yet always absent father (Hurt), coupled with a miserable, recalcitrant and unsupportive mother (Rampling) it's not difficult to see why she's so screwed up. Justine suffers from depression, a deliberate pathetic fallacy given that a planetary body named 'Melancholia' is about to smash into the Earth. But unlike in Antichrist, Justine isn't just another one of Von Trier's misogynistic caricatures. Rather, she is clearly troubled in a manner that can only correspond to Von Trier's own dark view on existence. As the planet gets nearer Justine's volatility gives way to serenity, experiencing visions of clarity alluding to a unique universal perspective only she is privy to. While clearly unhinged it is ironically Justine's nihilism which better prepares her for the coming calamity as she emerges from the film as the strongest character. Sister, Claire, is portrayed as order to Justine's chaos, the more rational and bourgeois of the two. It is her conventional approach to life, her belief in established societal 'norms' which cause her to become increasingly agitated when all is threatened. Von Trier fiendishly toys with this premise, taking regular people so convinced in the meaning and purpose of human structures only to shatter them as nothing more than meaningless illusions. Likewise Von Trier takes great pleasure felicitously putting the smug braggart John in his place. It's actually quite absorbing to watch these role reversals, exposing the jejune attitudes considered 'normal' in society. Indeed, Justine comes out of events looking relatively sane compared to everybody else sleepwalking through life with a normalcy bias.

Like all good science fiction, this is a piece which explores humanity and our place in the universe by examining how we react under extreme circumstances. Yes, there are some big sci-fi bloopers here and many will baulk at the scientific plausibility of it all, particularly at how a giant planet inches away from Earth doesn't seem to affect the weather or tides. Indeed, planet Melancholia merely remains a big CGI orb hovering ominously overhead for the most part. But then I suppose that would be to miss the point in that we couldn't be further removed from Roland Emmerich territory here. This is first and foremost a female-focussed melodrama and an apocalyptic destruction movie second. If you came to watch people running around like headless chickens while famous landmarks burn then this won't be for you.

Melancholia is a perturbing film, at peace with ideas of nothingness, the futility of life, that we're alone in the universe, no one is coming to help us, and ultimately mankind's extinction. Wagner is used to excellent effect, syncing perfectly with the mood of the film. Like The Tree of Life, if you're going to do any serious philosophical pondering you cannot feasibly do so unless it's to a score from one of history's greatest classical composers. Anything less epic just wouldn't work. In this way I suppose you could point to similarities between the two, although Melancholia follows a more linear and traditional format. Performances are strong throughout, naturalistic in what almost seems like a fly-on-the wall experience. Dunst is excellent with the material and this should be recognised as her breakthrough performance in much the same way as Natalie Portman in Black Swan. Strange, and yet strangely alluring.